MSU MATHEMATICS |
MTH 254H
|
1. Consider the vectors a = OA, b = OB, c = OC, and let α be the angle at A. Then:
2a. We compute: |p| = |u•v|⁄|u| = |(3,2)•(0,−10)|⁄|(3,2)| = 20⁄√13.
Now, starting with the unit-length vector u⁄|u| = 1⁄√13(3,2), we multiply by |p| = 20⁄√13 to get the right length, and −1 to get the right direction (since u makes an obtuse angle with v):
2c. Here p is the component of acceleration along the plane u, so the acceleration is |p| = 20⁄√13 ≈ 5.5 m/sec2, about half the acceleration of free-fall. The force on the surface is mass times the perpendicular acceleration, so a 1 kg object (pressing about |v| = 10 Newtons on a flat surface) would exert a force of |q| = 30⁄√13 ≈ 8.3 N.
2d. The vector u⊥ = (−2,3) clearly has u⊥•u = 0, so the vectors are orthogonal. Computing the projection of v on u⊥ does indeed produce the same q as in part (b).
4. If vectors a,b,c point to the vertices of the original triangle, the vectors pointing along the edges are a−b, a−c, b−c. The medial triangle has vertices:
5. Odd-numbered exercises in [MT] have answers in the back, p. 494.
1a. Going from a to b: f(t) = a + (b−a)t
= (1+3t, 4−2t) for t ∈ R.
Reverse direction, different parametrization of same line:
b + (a−b)t
= (4−3t, 2+2t).
1b. Orthogonal direction to line: m = (b−a)⊥ = (2,3) or any scalar multiple
(x,y) on line
⇔
m ⊥ (x,y)−(4,2)
⇔
m•((x,y)−(4,2)) = 0
⇔
m•(x,y) = m•(4,2)
⇔
2x + 3y = 14
Define ℓ(v) = m•v,
ℓ(x,y) = 2x + 3y, line = {(x,y) with ℓ(x,y) = 14}
1c,d. See Wolfram Alpha for both plots. Try clicking "Show contour lines", and note that raising each contour line ℓ(x,y) = c to its proper height z = c gives the 3D graph z = ℓ(x,y).
2a. The component of v = (x,y) parallel to a = (1,1) is the projection p = 1⁄2(x+y) (1,1), and the orthogonal component is:
2b. The projection mapping is P(v) = q, in coordinates P(x,y) = (1⁄2x − 1⁄2y , −1⁄2x + 1⁄2y). Since P(1,0) = (1⁄2 , −1⁄2), P(0,1) = (−1⁄2 , 1⁄2), the matrix of P is:
[P] | = |
[
| . |
2c. The vector q has signed length:
[ℓ] • [v] | = |
| • |
| = ax + by = ℓ(v) |
[L] • [v] | = |
| • |
| = |
| • |
| = |
| = | [L(v)] |
[I] = |
|
[L1] = |
| = |
| , | [L2] = |
| , | [L3] = ?? |
[L3] = [ L1(L2(i)) | L1(L2(j)) ] | = [ [L1]•[L2(i)] | [L1]•[L2(j)] ] | |||||
= |
|
| • |
| = |
|
| T | = |
|
1b. Four parametrized segments along 0 ≤ t ≤ 4:
1c. For f(x,y) = |x| + |y|, our curve is the level curve f(x,y) = 1. Graph:
2a. f(x,y) = x + 3y. Level curves: f(x,y) = c , y = −⅓x + k parallel lines. Ribs: z = f(x,c) = x + k , z = f(c,y) = 3y + k lines.
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
x'(a) |
y'(a) |
1b. Eliminating t from the system of equations {x = t2 , y = t3} gives t = ±√x, and y = ±x3/2 (two graphs). The function x3/2 rises faster than y = x, but not as fast as y = x2.
1c. The derivative is: c'(t) = (2t, 3t2), so c'(1) = (2,3). The linear approximation (red tangent line) is:
1d. c'(a) = 0 means zero velocity at time t = a. Here, the particle traveling along the curve slows down as it approaches time t = 0, stops, then gradually starts again in the opposite direction. No matter how it is represented, the curve has no well-defined tangent line at (x,y) = (0,0).
2a. The function f(x,y) = x2 + y has ∇f(x,y) = (2x,1), with ∇f(2,1) = (4,1). The linear approximation for (x,y) ≈ (2,1) is:
![]() | ![]() |
3a. f(x,y) = x + 3y , ∇f(x,y) = (1,3). That is, we draw the same vector (1,3) at each point (x,y), scaled down to fit the picture:
3b. f(x,y) = x2 + y , ∇f(x,y) = (2x,1). At a grid point (x,y), we draw an arrow (scaled) with vertical component 1, and horizontal component 2x: pointing to the right for x > 0, up for x = 0, and left for x < 0. Notice the vectors get longer near the sides, as the level curves get closer and the graph gets steeper.
4. The curve c(t) = et (cos(t), sin(t)) has derivative (velocity vector, tangent vector) given by the product rule:
and we have |c(t)| = et, and |c'(t)| = et √2. A constant angle between c(t) and c'(t) would mean a constant dot product between the corresponding unit vectors:
Thus θcc' = ±π⁄4 .
The moth would go inward along the path
c(−t) with tangent −c'(−t), and it would see the flame at the
origin in the direction −c(−t),
which would give the same constant angle
π⁄4 .
1a,b,c. f(x,y) = xy , ∇f(x,y) = (y,x).
2. f(x,y) = x4 − 2x2 − 3(2x+1)y2:
3. Letting x,y,z be the side-lengths of the rectangular bin, the volume is xyz = 1, and the surface area of the four sides is s = xy + yz + 2xz. Eliminating the variable z = 1⁄xy, we get the function
The gradient field is: ∇s(x,y) = (y − 1⁄x2 , x − 2⁄y2):
The only critical point, where ∇s(x,y) =
(y − 1⁄x2,
x − 2⁄y2) = (0,0),
is (x,y) = (2−1/3, 22/3) ≈ (0.8, 1.6).
The vector field plot shows this is a local minimum, since the uphill vectors all point outward from this point.
For completeness, we should also consider the critical points where
∇s is undefined, namely the boundary points
where x = 0 or y = 0; but these are
clearly vertical asymptotes where s(x,y) tends to infinity.
Thus, our final answer is: (x,y,z) = (2−1/3, 22/3, 2−1/3).
1a. Choose x,y as indep variables.
Solve V = xyz = 1 to get z = 1⁄xy .
Surface of bottom & 4 sides:
s(x,y) = xy + 2xz + 2yz
= xy + 2⁄y
+ 2⁄x over x,y > 0.
1b. Solve ∇s(x,y) =
(y − 2⁄x2,
x − 2⁄y2)
= (0,0)
Unique critical point (x,y) = (3√2, 3√2) must be min pt,
z = ½x = ½y
Min box is square, half as tall as wide.
Note: boundary points x,y → 0 or ∞ are max points, s(x,y) → ∞
1c. Gradient field plot shows min point about (1.3, 1.3), agreeing with (3√2, 3√2).
1d. Initial guess vo = (1,1), gradient ∇s(vo) = (−1, −1), get v1 = vo − ½∇s(vo) = (1.5,1.5), where ε = −½. Then: v2 = v1 − ½∇s(v1) = (1.19, 1.19),
Hf(x,y) = |
| , |
1b. We solve ∇f(x,y) = λ ∇g(x,y) and g(x,y) = 1. That is:
Clearly λ = 0 is not a solution, since this would mean ∇f(x,y) = (0,0),
giving the critical point we found in part (a),
which does not lie on x2 + y2 = 1.
Thus, we may divide the first two equations, giving
(2x+y+1)⁄x+2y+1
=
x⁄y .
Cross-multiplying gives y2 − x2 + y − x = 0,
which factors as (y−x)(y+x+1) = 0, giving solutions y = x or y = −x−1.
If y = x, the equation x2 + y2 = 1 gives
(x,y) =
±(1⁄√2, 1⁄√2) .
If y = −x−1, the equation x2 + y2 = 1 gives
(x,y) = (0, −1) or (−1, 0)
Evaluating f(x,y) on these 4 critical points gives:
1c. To find the critical points of:
1d. We show how minimizing f(x,y) over
the parametrized constraint curve c(t) = (cos(t), sin(t))
leads to the Lagrange Multiplier method,
in which we consider the curve as a contour
of g(x,y) = x2 + y2.
To minimize h(t) = f(c(t)), we solve
0 = h'(t) = ∇f(c(t)) • c'(t).
For a solution t = a with c(a) = (x0,y0),
we have ∇f(x0,y0) orthogonal
to c'(a), the tangent direction of
the circle S at (x0,y0).
On the other hand, the circle is defined by
g(x,y) = x2 + y2 = 1,
so we have g(c(t)) = 1. Differentiating
this and using the Chain Rule gives:
∇g(c(t)) • c'(t) for all t,
including t = a, so that ∇g(x0,y0)
is also orthogonal to the tangent direction c'(a).
Since both ∇f(x0,y0)
and ∇g(x0,y0)
are orthogonal to the same direction in R2,
they must be parallel.
1e. Evaluate f(x,y) both at the critical points found in part (a),
and at the constrained extrema found in part (b) or (c).
The largest/smallest of these gives the absolute max/min
of f(x,y) within the disk.
This is the two-dimensional
version of finding the max/min of a single-variable
function f(x) on an interval x ∈ [a,b]
by finding critical points of f(x) inside the interval,
then comparing to the endpoint values f(a), f(b).
Answer: the absolute minimum is at the interior
critical point (−⅓, −⅓);
the absolute maximum is at the boundary point
(1⁄√2, 1⁄√2).
2a. Letting x,y,z be the side-lengths of the rectangular bin, the volume is xyz = 1, and the surface area of the four sides is s = xy + yz + 2xz. Eliminating the variable z = 1⁄xy, we get the function
The gradient field is: ∇s(x,y) = (y − 1⁄x2 , x − 2⁄y2):
The only critical point, where ∇s(x,y) =
(y − 1⁄x2,
x − 2⁄y2) = (0,0),
is (x,y) = (2−1/3, 22/3) ≈ (0.8, 1.6).
The vector field plot shows this is a local minimum, since the uphill vectors all point outward from this point.
For completeness, we should also consider the critical points where
∇s is undefined, namely the boundary points
where x = 0 or y = 0; but these are
clearly vertical asymptotes where s(x,y) tends to infinity.
Thus, our final answer is: (x,y,z) = (2−1/3, 22/3, 2−1/3).
2b. Letting x,y,z be the side-lengths of the rectangular bin missing the top and front, the volume is V(x,y,z) = xyz = 1, with ∇V(x,y,z) = (yz, xz, xy). The surface area of the four sides is S(x,y,z) = xy + yz + 2xz, with ∇S(x,y,z) = (y+2z, x+z, y+2x). The Lagrange Multiplier method gives equations ∇S(x,y,z) = λ ∇V(x,y,z) and V(x,y,z) = 1, solved for variables x,y,z > 0, and λ:
2b. Same spreadsheet for alternative path gives ∫c F(c)•dc ≈ 7.00 .
2c. It seems quite plausible that these line integrals along different paths are approximating the same value 7.00 .
If we take a good guess that F = ∇f for f(x,y) = x+xy+y2, we get the exact value:
∫c F(c)•dc
≈ f(2,1) − f(0,0) = 7.00, confirming that the line integral does not depend on the path from
(0,0) to (1,2).
Also, we see that the midpoint-sample Riemann sum is highly accurate.
3a. ∫ F(c) • dc
= ∫10 F(c(t)) • c'(t) dt
= ∫10 F(3t, 5t) • (3t, 5t)' dt
= ∫10 (e5t, 3t e5t) • (3, 5) dt
= ∫10 3e5t + 15t e5t dt
= 3⁄5 e5t
+ 15t 1⁄5 e5t
− 15 ∫10 1⁄5 e5t dt
(integration by parts)
= 3⁄5 e5t
+ 3t e5t
− 3⁄5 e5t
= 3t e5t |1t=0
= 3e5.
Therefore, by the Gradient Theorem, and assuming f(0,0) = 0, we have f(3,5) = f(3,5) − f(0,0) = ∫ F(c) • dc = 3e5.
3b. We imitate the previous computation, replacing (3,5) by (a,b):
∫ F(c) • dc
= ∫10 F(c(t)) • c'(t) dt
= ∫10 F(at, bt) • (at, bt)' dt
= ∫10 (ebt, at ebt) • (a, b) dt
= ∫10 a ebt + abt ebt dt
= at ebt |1t=0 = a eb.
Therefore f(x,y) = x ey, and we easily check
∇f = F.
3c. ∫ F(c)•dc
=
∫10 F(at, 0)•(at, 0)' dt
+
∫21 F(a, b(t−1))•(a, b(t−1))' dt
=
∫10 (1, at)•(a, 0) dt
+
∫21 (eb(t−1), aeb(t−1))•(0, b) dt
=
∫10 a dt
+
∫21 ab eb(t−1) dt
=
at|10 + aeb(t−1)|21
=
aeb.
Therefore f(x,y) = xey as before.
Since in fact F = ∇f,
we must get the same answer f(a,b)−f(0,0)
for the line integral over any path from (0,0) to (a,b).
3d. Since we found in (b), (c) that F = ∇f for f(x,y) = xey, the line integral over any path from (0,0) to (1,1) is f(1,1) − f(0,0) = e. We say the vector field is conservative, or path-independent.
4a. Wolfram Alpha vector field plot.
4b. If the vector field F were the gradient
of a function f(x,y), the level curves would have to be
orthogonal to the vectors of F, i.e. radial lines. But there is no consistent way to assign heights to these lines: any pair of level curves are connected by short circular arcs with short vectors (small f-slope, small f-increase), and by long circular arcs with long vectors (large f-slope, large f-increase).
Therefore, F could not be the gradient of any such function f(x,y).
4c. The line integral over the straight-line path c from (0,0) to (a,b) gives zero for any (a,b): this is because the circular-field arrow F(at,bt) is always orthogonal to the line c, and to its tangent vector (a,b). Obviously, ∇(0) ≠ F(x,y).
4d. The line integral over the broken-line path
from (0,0) to (a,0) to (a,b) gives zero for the first part, and ab for the second part. Thus, f(x,y) = xy,
with ∇f(x,y) = (y,x) ≠ F(x,y).
In fact, if two curves from (0,0) to (a,b) give inconsistent answers, we say the field is not conservative, and it has no possible potential function.
5. Integrating over the straightline path c(t) = (at, bt) from (0,0) to (a,b), and assuming f(0,0) = 0, we find:
A simpler integration results if we consider the rectangular path from (0,0) to (a,0) to (a,b) given by c(t) = (at, 0) for t ∈ [0,1] and c(t) = (a, b(t−1)) for t ∈ [1,2]. Then we get:
3a. Vertical, so (0, g(x,y)), length depends only on height, so (0, g(y)). Ans: F(x,y) = (0, y2) = ∇(0, ⅓y3)
3b. Clearly g(x,y) (1,1), length depends only on x, so g(x) (1,1). Ans: F(x,y) = x(1,1) = (x,x)
3c. Radial unit length would be F(v) = v⁄|v|. To adjust length by radius, scale: g(|v|) v⁄|v|. Here, g(0) = 1, g(1) = 0, g(r) < 0 for r > 1; take g(r) = 1−r. Ans: (1−√(x2+y2)) (x,y)⁄√(x2+y2) .
3d. Vertical, so (0, g(x,y)). Length depends only on horizontal position, so (0, g(x)). Ans: (0, e−x2).
4. To have consistent circular flows, the circular gradient field must have magnitude |F(v)| = 1⁄|v|, so take g(|v|) = 1⁄|v|2. Then z = f(x,y) has radial level curves, and is a helical staircase surface, in which the height of a radial line equals its polar angle: f(x,y) = θ = arctan(y⁄x), at least for x > 0.
A small paddlewheel placed at any point
is pushed vertically on one side more than on the other,
giving a counterclockwise rotational force,
which means curl F > 0.
In fact, curl F =
∂⁄∂x(x)
− ∂⁄∂y(0)
= 1 − 0 = 1.
Since the curl is non-zero, the field is not
conservative, and cannot have a potential function f.
1b. F(x,y) = (x, 0).
The equal flows on the top and bottom of a paddlewheel
cancel each other, so we should have curl F = 0.
In fact, curl F =
∂⁄∂x(0)
− ∂⁄∂y(x)
= 0 − 0 = 0.
The line integral along c(t) = (at, bt) is:
f(a,b) =
∫01 F(at, bt) • (at, bt)' dt
=
∫01 (at, 0) • (a, b) dt
=
½a2.
The potential function is thus f(x,y) = ½x2.
1c. F(x,y) = (−y, x).
A paddlewheel is pushed harder on the side away
from the origin than on the side facing the origin,
giving a counterclockwise rotation,
curl F > 0.
Using the other physical model,
a person sitting anywhere on a turntable
must turn his head at a constant rate to counter the table's rotation, so we expect curl F is constant.
In fact, curl F =
∂⁄∂x(x)
− ∂⁄∂y(−y)
= 1 − (−1) = 2.
There is no potential function.
1d. F(x,y) = 1⁄r2 (x,y).
The potential function is f(x,y) = r G(r), where G(c) = ∫c0 g(r) dr.
2a. The magnitude of F(x,y) = 1⁄r2 (−y, x) is |F(x,y)| = 1⁄r2 |(−y, x)| = 1⁄r2 r = 1⁄r .
On the side away from the center, a paddlewheel is pushed counterclockwise by the flow; on the side facing the center, it is pushed clockwise along a shorter arc by a stronger flow. The two forces balance, and we should have curl F = 0.
2b. For F(x,y) = (−y⁄x2+y2 , x⁄x2+y2), we use the Quotient Rule to get:
That is, F has no rotation at any point where it is defined, though it has some singular behavior at the origin.
2c. To compute the potential function f(a,b), we take the line integral along a two-segment path: we define the constant s = √(a2+b2), and take the line segment c1(t) = (1−t + ts, 0) from (1,0) to (s,0); then the circular arc c2(t) = (s cos(t), s sin(t)) from (s,0) to (a,b), where t goes from 0 to θ = arctan(b/a), which is the angle from the x-axis to the radial vector (a,b). The potential function is given by:
In the graph z = f(x,y), the ray at angle θ from the x-axis is at height θ, for −π ≤ θ ≤ π. This leads to a discontinuity on the negative x-axis, where the angle can be either π or −π. Thus, we cannot define the potential function all the way around the origin, which reflects the fact that F does have a rotation around that point, though nowhere else.
Here the corner (a,b) stays constant while Δx and Δy independently approach zero.
∮ F(c) • dc | = | ∫0Δx F(a+t,b) • (1,0) dt + ∫0Δy F(a+Δx,b+t) • (0,1) dt |
+ ∫0Δx F(a+Δx−t,b+Δy) • (−1,0) dt + ∫0Δy F(a,b+Δy−t) • (0,−1) dt | ||
= | ∫0Δx p(a+t,b) dt + ∫0Δy q(a+Δx,b+t) dt | |
− ∫0Δx p(a+Δx−t,b+Δy) dt − ∫0Δy q(a,b+Δy−t) dt | ||
= | ∫0Δx p(a+t,b) dt + ∫0Δy q(a+Δx,b+t) dt | |
− ∫0Δx p(a+t,b+Δy) dt − ∫0Δy q(a,b+t) dt |
∮ F(c) • dc | ≈ | ∫0Δx p(a,b) + ∂p⁄∂x t dt + ∫0Δy q(a,b) + ∂q⁄∂x Δx + ∂q⁄∂y t dt |
− ∫0Δx p(a,b) + ∂p⁄∂x t + ∂p⁄∂y Δy dt − ∫0Δy q(a,b) + ∂q⁄∂y t dt | ||
= | − ∂p⁄∂y ΔxΔy + ∂q⁄∂x ΔxΔy, |
∬D g(x,y) dx dy = ∫cd (∫ab g(x,y) dx) dy = ∫ab (∫cd g(x,y) dy) dx.
2a. The solid is under the graph z = x+y2 and above the rectangle (x,y) ∈ [0,1]×[−1,1]. To visualize the graph, consider the "backbone" slice above the x-axis (y=0), which is just the line z = x; and the "ribs" slices perpendicular to the x-axis, above x = c, which are parabolas z = c+y2 rising from the backbone above the x-axis. See the graph in Wolfram.
2b. The graph is a quadrant of a saddle surface, with upward parabola above y = x, downward parabola above y = −x, and two flat lines above the x and y axes.
More quantitatively, the field vectors around the boundary have length about 1 or 2, somewhat oblique from the tangent direction, and the curve has length about 6 (like a unit circle), so the line integral might be about 5? Also, the field vectors grow at a moderate linear rate, so the curl is not large, and the region has area about 3 (like a unit circle), so we would expect a double integral around 5? These are not reliable estimates, but they give an idea of the magnitude and sign of the answers (which in fact must be exactly equal).
2. D = {(x,y) with −1 ≤ x ≤ 1 and x2 ≤ y ≤ 2−x2}. Compute the double integral ∬D curl F(x,y) dy dx as in the previous HW. Note: This integral would be harder to do in the opposite order ∬D curl F(x,y) dx dy because D would have to be split into two pieces with different formulas. Answer: 16⁄3 .
3. The bottom curve is c1(t) = (t, t2) for −1 ≤ t ≤ 1, moving left-to-right under D (counter-clockwise). The top curve is c2(t) = (−t, 2−t2) for −1 ≤ t ≤ 1, moving right-to-left from c2(−1) = (1,1) to c2(1) = (−1,1), so as to go counter-clockwise above D. Then ∮c F = ∫c1 F + ∫c2 F. Answer: 16⁄3 .
4. The Curl Theorem (Fund Thm for Curl) guarantees that the circulation of F around c (the boundary of D) is equal to the double integral of the rate of circulation inside D, meaning #2 and #3 must give the same answer. This should be consistent with the estimates from #1.
We compute this in coordinates, with c(t) = (x(t),y(t)) for t ∈ [0,1]:
Also, any small box has zero flow across the vertical sides, and bottom inflow equal to top outflow, so div F(x,y) = 0 everywhere. Compute: div F = ∂⁄∂x(0) + ∂⁄∂y(x) = 0.
1 & 2b. F(x,y) = (x,0)
1 & 2c. F(x,y) = (x,y)
1 & 2d. F(x,y) = sin(x2+y2) (−y,x)
= ∫10 [1⁄1+x2 |1−y x=0 dy = ∫10 1⁄1+(1−y)2 − 1 dy = π⁄4 − 1.
The boundary of R consists of the line segments c1(t) = (t,0), c2(t) = (1−t,t), c3(t) = (0,1−t), each for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1; and the total flux is the line integral:
In detail, one of these is:
For any small radial box, the radial edges have zero flow; and the inner circular edge has a shorter arc with longer inflowing F vectors, while the outer circular edge as a longer arc with shorter outflowing F vectors. Thus we may guess div F ≈ 0 everywhere (except at the origin, where there is a positive outflow from zero area, an infinite rate of outflow).
1b. Compute for radial field F(x,y) = g(x2+y2) (x,y) = 1⁄(x2+y2) (x,y):
2. The arclength of the graph y = f(x) for x ∈ [a,b] is L = ∫ba √(1 + f'(x)2) dx.
3. The arclength of the polar graph r = f(θ) for θ ∈ [a,b] is L = ∫ba √(f(t)2 + f'(t)2) dt.
4a. Parametrize the curve as c(t) = (t,t2) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, giving length L = ∫10 √(12 + (2t)2) dt = 1⁄2√5 + 1⁄4log(2+√5). Even quite simple curves give difficult arclength integrals, which can usually only be evaluated numerically.
4b. See [MT] Ch 4.2 Example 2, p 229, or Wikipedia.
4c. This is the polar graph r = f(θ) = eθ ; apply the general polar integral length formula.
| ≈ |
| = |
| + |
| • | [h] | . |
Jacobian matrix in terms of rows (gradients):
[DGa] | = |
| = |
| = |
|
[DP(r,θ)] | = |
| = |
|
= |
| + |
| • |
|
[DP(2,π⁄4)] | = |
|
2 | 1 |
1 | 3 |
1b. The parameter region is the standard triangle with vertices (u,v) = (0,0), (1,0), (0,1). That is, R* = {(u,v) with 0 ≤ u and 0 ≤ v ≤ 1−u} = {(u,v) with u ≥ 0, v ≥ 0, u+v ≤ 1}.
1c. [ L ]−1 = 1⁄5 [
3 | −1 |
−1 | 2 |
2a. F(r,θ) = (1⁄2 r cos(θ), 1⁄3 r sin(θ)) over the region (r,θ) ∈ R* = [0,1]×[0,2π].
2b. The rotation map Rotπ⁄4 is defined by a rotation matrix which works out to Rot(x,y) = 1⁄√2(x−y, x+y). Applying this to the output of the previous F(r,θ), then translating by (1,2), gives:
3. How P maps the (r,θ)-gridlines to the (x,y)-plane:
![]() |
| ![]() |
4. Specializing the Jacobian matrix in the above Notes to the point (r,θ) = (2,π⁄4) gives:
[DP(2,π⁄4)] | = |
| = |
|
5. The affine approximation function to P near the base point (r,θ) = (2,π⁄4) is:
6a. The vector parallel to v = (u,v), having length 1⁄|v|, is F(v) = v⁄|v|2, which means Inv(u,v) = ( u⁄u2+v2 , v⁄u2+v2 ).
6b. To see the transformation of the (u,v) grid under the mapping Inv(u,v), apply a parametric curve plotter successively to c(t) = Inv(1,t), Inv(2,t), Inv(3,t) gives red circles labeled u = 1,2,3 with diameter 1, 1⁄2, 1⁄3, all passing through the origin and with centers on the y-axis. Similarly for blue circles c(t) = Inv(t,1), Inv(t,2), Inv(t,3) centered on the x-axis.
6c. The mapping Inv : R2−{0} → R2−{0} is clearly its own inverse, since Inv(Inv(v)) = v. If we think of the first R2 as the (u,v)-plane and the second as the (x,y)-plane, then we may write the inverse mapping as Inv(x,y) = ( x⁄x2+y2 , y⁄x2+y2 ).
= det[L] = det(u,v) = | det | [
| = ad − bc |
det[DP(r,θ)] | = [∂P⁄∂r | ∂P⁄∂θ] | = | det |
| = | det |
| ||||||
[ |
| ] | = [T] • | [ |
| ] |
1b. The region D is an ellipse with center (1,0), height 1, and width 2, so it is parametrized by a shift and scaling of polar coordinates: E(u,v) = (x,y) = (1 + u cos(v), 2u sin(v)), over the parameter region D* = [0,1]×[0,2π]. This has Jacobian determinant:
det[DE(u,v)] | = | det |
| = | det |
| ||||||
|
3.We have the vectors u = (a,b), v = (c,d), the projection p of v on u, and the projection q of v on u⊥.
5a. [T] = |
|
5b. B* is the triangle with vertices (s,t) = (0,0), (−1,1), (1,1), given by 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, −t ≤ s ≤ t.
5c. (x,y) = (−½s + ½t , ½s + ½t). [U] = [T]−1 = |
|
This is indeed the inverse of [T], since: [U] • [T] = |
| • |
| = |
| . |
5d,e. We have U(B*) = B, one-to-one and onto. Since U is linear, it is its own derivative at every point: DU(s,t) = U, and |∂(x,y)⁄∂(s,t)| = |det[U]| = ½ . (Note the det is actually −½, meaning the mapping U is orientation-reversing, so we have to take the absolute value.) Also y−x = s, y+x = t. Thus:
det |
| = | u1v2w3 − u1v3w2 − u2v1w3 + u2v3w1 + u3v1w2 − u3v2w1 | = | ∑σ sgn(σ) uσ(1)vσ(2)wσ(3) | , |
ℓ(x,y,z) = det |
| = | u1v2z − u1v3y − u2v1z + u2v3x + u3v1y − u3v2x |
= (u2v3− u3v2) x + (−u1v3+u3v1) y + (u1v2− u2v1) z | = | q • (x,y,z) |
q = u×v = (u1,u2,u3) × (v1,v2,v3) = (u2v3− u3v2 , −u1v3+u3v1 , u1v2− u2v1)
u × v | = | det |
|
= | det |
| i | − | det |
| j | + | det |
| k |
1a. Directions along A: v1 = b−a = (1,0,1) , v2 = c−a = (1,1,−1).
1b. P(s,t) = sv1 + tv2 + a = (s+t, 1+t, 1+s−t).
1c. The number of independent orthogonal vectors is n−k = 3−2 = 1. We want q = (q1, q2, q3) with q•v1 = 0 and q•v2 = 0, giving the linear system:
Thus, a defining equation is q•(v−a) = 0, which in coordinates v = (x,y,z) can be simplified to:
1d. Let r − a = (3,3,4) be the vector from the basepoint a = (0,1,1) on V to the point r = (3,4,5) off of V. The orthogonal distance from V to r can be obtained by projecting r − a on the orthogonal vector q; or simply by dotting r − a with the unit vector q⁄|q|:
3a. The triple u = (1,1,0), v = (1,0,1), w = (1,1,2):
Notice that we draw the x,y,z axes as a right-handed triple, and v is in the xz-plane in the foreground, whereas w recedes into the picture. This is a left-handed system: model it with your left palm up, index finger horizontal along u, middle finger almost vertical along v, thumb pointing away from you along w. The left-handedness is reflected in the determinant −2, the signed volume of the corresponding parallelopiped, as we will see next time.
We compute the determinant, the signed volume of the parallelepiped spanned by the three vectors, writing u, v, w as the columns of a 3×3 matrix, with one term for each permutation of {1,2,3}:
det(u, v, w) | = | det |
| = | u1v2w3 − u1v3w2 − u2v1w3 + u2v3w1 + u3v1w2 − u3v2w1 |
= 1·0·2 − 1·1·1 − 1·1·2 + 1·1·1 + 0·1·1 − 0·1·1 = −2.
= 1 det(0,1 | 1,2) − 1 det(1,1 | 1,2) + 0 det(1,0 | 1,1) = −1 − 1 + 0 = −2.
The negative value verifies the left-handedness.
3b. The triple u = (1,0,1), v = (1,1,0), w = (1,1,2), with the first two vectors switched from part (a), is right-handed, with the opposite determinant: det(u,v,w) = 2.
3c. The triple u = (1,1,0), v = (1,0,1), w = (2,1,1) has w = u + v, which means the three vectors all lie in the same plane: they are linearly dependent. Thus, the parallelepiped is flat, with volume zero, and we may verify det(u,v,w) = 0. The triple is degenerate, neither right- nor left-handed.
4a. The directions parallel to the plane are u = b − a = (1,0,1) and v = c − a = (1,1,−1), giving the orthogonal direction q = u × v = (−1,2,1).
4b. The equation q • w = q • a becomes (−1,2,1) • (x,y,z) = (−1,2,1) • (0,1,1), or −x + 2y + z = 3. This agrees with the previous HW.
5a. q = (1,1,0) × (1,0,1) = (1,−1,−1)
5b. q • w = (1,−1,−1) • (1,1,2) = −2. This agrees with the previous HW.
6a. The determinant formula defining q = u× is: det(u, w) = q • w. Writing u = (u1, u2), w = (x,y), and q = (a,b), this becomes u1y − u2x = ax + by, so q = (−u2, u1), which is the counterclockwise perpendicular vector to (u1, u2). That is, u× = u⊥.
6b. For three vectors u, v, w ∈ R4, their cross product q = u×v×w is the vector orthogonal to all three and with length equal to the volume of the three-dimensional box spanned by them. Its coordinates are the coefficients of x1, . . . , x4 in the determinant:
det |
| . |
[L] = [L(i) | L(j) | L(k)] = | 1⁄14 |
| . |
1b. The mapping R1 = Rot90,i is 90° around the x-axis. (Here we use a right-hand rule, so that if we point the thumb along the x-axis, the yz-plane is rotated in the direction of the fingers.) The matrix is:
[R1] = [R1(i) | R1(j) | R1(k)] = |
| . |
1d. The matrix of R3(x) = R2(R1(x)) is gotten by matrix multiplication: [R3] = [R2]•[R1]. This is a 120° rotation around the axis (1,1,1), taking each axis to the next in a cycle. The composition of any two rotations is again a rotation.
1e. The shear rotation has a matrix [S] with det[S] = 1, so it does preserve volume, even though it distorts angles.
2a. The level surface f(x,y,z) = xy−z2 = 0 is a circular cone around the axis (1,−1,0). Its other level surfaces are hyperboloids of one or two sheets:
2b. We have ∇f(x,y,z) =
(∂⁄∂x,
∂⁄∂y,
∂⁄∂z)(xy−z2)
=
(y, x, −2z),
so ∇f(a) = ∇f(1,2,3) = (2,1,−6).
The level surface through a = (1,2,3) is f(x,y,z) = f(1,2,3) = −7,
and the tangent plane to this surface is
orthogonal to the gradient vector at a.
The tangent plane equation is
∇f(a)•(v−a) = 0,
i.e.
(2, 1, −6)•(x−1, y−2, z−3) = 2(x−1) + (y−2) − 6(z−3) = 0,
3a. The function f(x,y,z) = g(x,y) − z has the level surface f(x,y,z) = 0 equal to the graph z = g(x,y). Any other level surface f = k is the graph z = g(x,y) + k, an up or down translate of z = g(x,y).
3b. The tangent plane of z = g(x,y) at the point (a,b,g(a,b)) is the graph of the linear approximation:
4a. The vector field F(x,y,z) = (−x,−y,1) points in toward the z-axis and tilts upward. Nearer the z-axis, the vectors get shorter and tilt up more, pointing straight up along the axis itself.
4b. Using the Gradient Theorem, f(a,b,c) − f(0,0,0) = ∮ F(c)•dc = ∫10 F(at,bt,ct) • (at,bt,ct)' dt = ∫10 (−at,−bt,1) • (a,b,c) dt = ∫10 −a2t − b2t + c dt = −½a2t2 − ½b2t2 + ct |1t=0 = −½a2 − ½b2 + c. Setting the constant of integration as f(0,0,0) = 0, we get f(x,y,z) = −½x2 − ½y2 + z, which indeed gives ∇f(x,y,z) = (−x,−y,1) = F(x,y,z).
4c. f(a,b,c) = ∫10 F(at, bt2, ct3) • (at, bt2, ct3)' dt = ∫10 (−at, −bt2, 1)•(a, 2bt, 3ct2) dt = ∫10 −a2t − 2b2t3 + 3ct2 dt = −1⁄2a2t2 − 2⁄4b2t4 + ct3 |1t=0 = −½a2 − ½b2 + c, giving the same f(x,y,z) = −½x2 − ½y2 + z as before. This is expected because of the Gradient Theorem, which guarantees that a gradient vector field is path-independent, depending only on the enpoints of the path of integration.
4d. L = ∮ |dc| = ∫10 |c'(t)| dt = ∫10 |(1, 2t, 3t2)| dt = ∫10 √(1 + 4t2 + 9t4) dt ≈ 1.86 , slightly longer than the straight-line path with length |(1,1,1)| = √3 ≈ 1.73 .
5a. The vector field F(x,y,z) = (−y,x,1) rotates around the z-axis (with right-handed orientation) and tilts upward. Nearer the z-axis, the vectors get shorter and tilt up more, pointing straight up along the axis itself.
5b. F(c)•dc = ∫10 F(at,bt,ct) • (at,bt,ct)' dt = ∫10 (−bt,at,1) • (a,b,c) dt = ∫10 −bat + abt + c dt = ct |1t=0 = c. Thus f(x,y,z) = z gives ∇f(x,y,z) = (0,0,1), which is not F(x,y,z) = (−y,x,1). Thus, F cannot be a conservative vector field: there is no potential function.
5c.
∫10 F(at2, bt2, ct2) • (at2, bt2, ct2)' dt
=
∫10 (−bt2, at2, 1)•(2at,2bt,2ct) dt
=
∫10 2ct dt
=
ct2|1t=0
= c.
This gives the same function f(x,y,z) = z as in part (b).
In fact, even if the vector field is non-conservative,
and the line integral changes upon changing the path
between fixed endpoints,
nevertheless the line integral is
unchanged upon reparametrizing the same curve.
We say that line integrals are always
independent of parametrization, even if they are
not path-independent.
5d. The vector field is not conservative because its vortex pattern has non-zero circulation, and thus gives different line integrals along the two halves of a loop. In the next lecture, we will define curl F, and see it is non-zero.
1a. Using the determinant formula, curl(−x,−y,1) = (0,0,0). This makes sense from the picture, since for any small rectangle in a coordinate plane, F is either perpendicular to it, or pushes along opposite sides equally, making zero circulation near every point.
1b. We have curl(−y,x,1) = (0,0,2), which matches the rotation of F around the z-axis in the picture. Also, I can use the right-hand rule to determine the polarity of the rotation axis: if I curl my fingers in the direction of rotation, my thumb points upward in the positive z-direction, agreeing with curl F = +2k.
2. Odd-numbered exercise answers [MT] p. 515.
det |
| = | det |
|
= | det |
| x | − | det |
| y | + | det |
| z. |
The Frenet coordinates of c(t) are thus:
1c. Wolfram gives:
Here is a Mathematica file you can use to learn relevant commands
2. Given (x,y,z), the radius from the z-axis is r = √(x2+y2), and the radius from the origin is the hypotenuse of the right triangle with vertices (0,0,0), (x,y,0), (x,y,z):
Therefore:
3a. Taking 2×2 subdeterminants of the Jacobian DS(ρ,θ,φ) of S = Sph gives the cross product:
2a. The graph z = f(x,y) is parametrized by T(x,y) = (x, y, f(x,y)), giving stretching factor:
2b. The surface of revolution z = f(√(x2+y2) is parametrized by the cylindrical coordinate mapping T(r,θ) = (r cos(θ), r sin(θ), f(r)), giving stretching factor:
2c. The right circlular cone with height a and base radius b has a vertex-to-rim radius of ρ = √(a2+b2), and a rim circumference C = 2πb. We can unroll the lateral surface into a sector of a circle of radius ρ, with circular arc C. The area A of a sector is proportional to its circular arc, so C⁄2πρ = A⁄πρ2 . That is: A = πb√(a2+b2).
The cone is parametrized by T(r,θ) = (r cos(θ), r sin(θ), a⁄b r) for 0 ≤ r ≤ b and 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π. The formula of part (b) becomes:
3a. The sphere of radius ρ = R is parametrized by P(θ,φ) = Sph(R,θ,φ), with
Area = ∫θ=02π∫φ=0π R2 sin(φ) dθ dφ = 4πR2.
3b. Consider the toroidal coordinate mapping:
The Jacobian derivative matrix is:
[DT] = |
| . |
For fixed r, the torus surface parametrization T(θ,φ) = T(r,θ,φ) gives the tangent vectors ∂T⁄∂θ , ∂T⁄∂φ of T(θ,φ) are the same as the corresponding columns of T(r,θ,φ) above. The normal vector is:
The area of the torus is thus:
4a. We compute: a×b = (1,2,−1) × (1,0,1) = (2,−2,−2).
4b. For v = (x,y,z), we have:
curl F in tangent |
plane of S |
area stretch |
factor of P |
∬S (curl F) • dS = ∮ F(c) • dc,
∬S* curl F(P(u,v)) • (∂P⁄∂u×∂P⁄∂v) du dv = ∫01 F(c(t)) • c'(t) dt.
| = [L]u = U−1[L] = UT[L]. |
1b. The directional curls around the x,y,z axes are the components of the vector curl: curl(1,0,0) = 1, curl(0,1,0) = −1, curl(0,0,1) = 0.
1c. For a direction v with |v| = 1, the directional curl around the axis v is:
1d.
The vector field, being independent of z, has the same vectors on each horizontal plane.
At every point, the main rotation is around the direction (1,−1,0). This is evident on the line y = x itself, but is also true on lines like y = x + 1, since the arrows get longer at points farther from y = x.
2a. The spherical coordinate parametrization of the vertical half-sphere is:
2b. For F(x,y,z) = (0, 0, y(z+1)), we have:
2c. The integral of the curl over the surface is:
∬S curl F • dn
=
∫
−π/2
π/2
∫ 0
π
curl F(sin(φ)cos(θ), sin(φ)sin(θ), cos(φ)) • n(φ,θ) dφ dθ
=
∫
−π/2
π/2
∫ 0
π
(cos(φ)+1, 0, 0)
• (sin2(φ)cos(θ), sin2(φ)sin(θ), sin(φ)cos(φ))
dφ dθ
=
∫
−π/2
π/2
∫ 0
π
(cos(φ)+1) sin2(φ) cos(θ)
dφ dθ
=
(∫
−π/2
π/2
cos(θ)
dθ)
(∫ 0
π
(cos(φ)+1) sin2(φ)
dφ)
= (2)(π⁄2)
= π.
2d. The vertical boundary circle ∂S, with equations x = 0 and y2+z2 = 1, is given parametrically by c(t) = (0, cos(t), sin(t)) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π. Note that in curling the fingers of my right hand around c, my thumb points along the positive x-axis, which is the positive direction for S. The tangent vector is c'(t) = (0, −sin(t), cos(t)).
2e. The circulation around the boundary is:
∮ F(c) • dc
=
∫02π F(0, cos(t), sin(t))
• (0, cos(t), sin(t))' dt
=
∫02π (0, 0, cos(t)(sin(t)+1))
• (0, −sin(t), cos(t)) dt
=
∫02π cos2(t)(sin(t)+1) dt
=
π.
This agrees with part (c), as it must by the Curl Theorem.
3a. Cylindrical coorinates: P(r,θ) = (r cos(θ), r sin(θ), r cos(θ) + 1) for 0 ≤ r ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π. The boundary is: c(t) = (cos(t), sin(t), cos(t)+1) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π.
3b. n(r,θ) =
∂P⁄∂r
×
∂P⁄∂r
=
(cos(θ), sin(θ), cos(θ)) ×
(−r sin(θ), r cos(θ), −r sin(θ))
= (−r, 0, r).
The normal vector function
is so simple because S lies in a plane
orthogonal to (−1, 0, 1). The length |n| is the stretching factor of the parametrization: the grid boxes of P have size proportional to the radius r.
The tangent vector of the curve is:
c'(t) = (−sin(t), cos(t), −sin(t)).
3c. ∮ F(c) • dc = ∫02π F(cos(t), sin(t), cos(t)+1) • (cos(t), sin(t), cos(t)+1)' dt = ∫02π (−sin(t), cos(t), cos(t)+1) • (−sin(t), cos(t), −sin(t)) dt = 2π.
3d. We have curl F = (0,0,2), meaning that near every point, F primarily rotates around a vertical axis. The flux of the curl through S is:
∬S F × dn
=
∫01 ∫02π (0,0,2) ×
(−r, 0, r) dθ dr
=
∫01 4πr dr
=
2π, which agrees with part (c), confirming
the Curl Theorem in this case.
4. If the Jacobian [DP] is a square matrix, this follows from properties of the determinant:
det([DP]T [DP]) = det[DP]T det[DP] = (det[DP])2.
The top surface S1 is the same as S from the previous HW, P1(r,θ) = (r cos(θ), r sin(θ), r cos(θ) + 1) for 0 ≤ r ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π.. The side surface S2 is defined by P2(θ,z) = (cos(θ), sin(θ), z) over S2* defined by 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π and 0 ≤ z ≤ cos(θ)+1. The bottom surface S3 is the unit disk P3(r,θ) = (r cos(θ), r sin(θ), 0) over S3* defined by 0 ≤ r ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π.
1b. The stretching factor of Q(r,θ,z) is the determinant of its Jacobian matrix, i.e. the volume of the parallelopiped spanned by the gridline tangent vectors ∂Q⁄∂r, ∂Q⁄∂θ, ∂Q⁄∂z. This works out to det[DQ] = r, the same as for polar coordinates, since the z direction is not stretched at all.
1c. The normal vector of S1 is dn1 = (−r, 0, r), which correctly points upward (outward from R). The normal vector of S2 is dn2 = (cos(θ), sin(θ), 0), which points outward. The normal vector of S3 seems to be (cos(θ), sin(θ), 0) × (−r sin(θ), r cos(θ), 0) = (0, 0, r), but this points upward into R, so we must use its outward-pointing negative: n3 = (0, 0, −r).
1d. The total flux of F over the top surface is: ∬S1 F • dn2 = ∬S1* F(P1(r, θ)) • n1(r,θ) dr dθ = ∫01 ∫02π (−r sin(θ), r cos(θ), r cos(θ) + 1) • (−r, 0, r) dr dθ = π.
From drawing R and F, we can see that F is parallel to the surface along S2 and S3, so it has no flux through these surfaces. This can be confirmed by calculating ∬S2 F • dn2 = ∬S3 F • dn3 = 0. Therefore the total flux over the surface ∂R = S1 ∪ S2 ∪ S3 is π + 0 + 0 = π.
1e. We have div F =
∂⁄∂x(−y)
+
∂⁄∂y(x)
+
∂⁄∂z(z)
= 1.
That is, F has a constant rate of flux from
every point, due to the smaller inflow at the bottom of
a small box than the outflow at the top.
Thus ∭R div F dx dy dz
= ∭R* 1 det[DQ] dz dθ dr
= ∫01 ∫02π
∫0r cos(θ)+1 r dz dθ dr = π, which agrees with (d), confirming
the Divergence Theorem in this case.
1a. From the picture of F(x,y) = (x+1, xy), we can see that curl(F) > 0 on the whole region. Also, F • c' is positive on the left, bottom, and right boundaries of R, while it is moderately negative on the top boundary (oriented right-to-left); thus the total rotation around the boundary should be positive.
Computing the left side of the Curl Theorem, with curl(F) = y − 0:
∮ F • dc | = | ∫−11 F(t,0) • (t,0)' dt + ∫02 F(1,t) • (1,t)' dt |
+ ∫1−1 F(t,1+t2) • (t,1+t2)' dt + ∫20 F(−1,t) • (−1,t)' dt | ||
= | ∫−11 (t+1,0) • (1,0) dt + ∫02 (2,t) • (0,1) dt | |
+ ∫1−1 (t+1,t+t3) • (1,2t) dt + ∫20 (0,−t) • (0,1) dt | ||
= | 2 + 2 − 62⁄15 + 2 = 28⁄15. |
1b. Split the region along the y-axis so that each half is doubly simple, with no vertical or horizontal bays or dents:
R2 = {(x,y) with −1 ≤ x ≤ 0, 0 ≤ y ≤ 1+x2} = {(x,y) with 0 ≤ y ≤ 2, −1 ≤ x ≤ −b(y)},
1c. For the region R1, and F = (p,q) = (x+1, xy), the curl integral is:
∬R1 curl(F) dy dx | = | ∬R1 (∂q⁄∂x − ∂p⁄∂y) dy dx | |
= | ∫ y=0 2 ∫ x=b(y) 1 ∂⁄∂x(xy) dx dy − ∫ x=0 1 ∫ y=0 x2+1 ∂⁄∂y(x+1) dy dx | ||
= | ∫ y=0 2 [xy]x=b(y) x=1 dy − ∫ x=0 1 [x+1]y=0 x2+1 dx | ||
= | ∫ y=0 2 1y − b(y)y dy − ∫ x=0 1 (x+1) − (x+1) dx. | ||
= | ∫ y=0 2 q(1,y) − q(b(y),y) dy − ∫ x=0 1 p(x,x2+1) − p(x,0) dx. |
∮ (p(c1),0) • dc1+ ∮ (0,q(c)) • dc1 | = | ∫01 p(t,0) (t)' + ∫02 p(1,t) (1)' + ∫10 p(t,t2+1) (t)' dt + ∫10 p(0,t) (0)' dt |
+ ∫01 q(t,0) (0)' + ∫02 q(1,t) (t)' + ∫20 q(t,b(t)) (t)' dt. |
4. To prove Stokes' Theorem ∮c F•dc = ∬S (curl F)•dS, write the surface in space as a graph (or more generally a parametrized surface) over a parameter region in the plane. Explicitly compute both sides of the equation in coordinates, making use of the Chain Rule. Reduce the LHS to a line integral around the parameter region boundary, and the RHS to the integral of a certain function over the parameter region. Then notice that these are equal by Green's Theorem.
To prove Gauss' Theorem ∬S F•dS = ∭R div(F) dR, assume R is a symple solid region, meaning it can be parametrized as lying between floor and ceiling graph surfaces in the z-direction, and above a parameter region in the xy-plane; and symmetrically for the y- and x- directions. Then the LHS and RHS of the equation each split into three terms involving the three components of the field. Computing each of these with respect to the corresponding parametrization of R, a straightforward calculation and an application of the single-variable Fundamental Theorem of Calculus shows the two sides are equal.
1b. Use ∇|v| = v⁄|v| , and ∇f(|v|) = f '(|v|) v⁄|v| . Then the terms in the Product Rule both vanish.
1c. Write the vector field as f(|v|) v⁄|v|3, and use the Product Rule to get f '(|v|) = 0, so that f(|v|) = C a constant.
2a. Each term Gi coming from a point-mass has zero curl and divergence, using the first problem (with a shift v → v−ci). Then div(∑i Gi) = ∑i div(Gi).
2b. The potential of each Gi is Mi ⁄|v−ci| , and the sum of the potentials is the potential of the sum.
3a. A small cube has mass μ(t) Δt1Δt2Δt3, approximately concentrated at the point t = (t1,t2,t3), so its gravity field at v = (x,y,z) is −μ(t)(v−t)⁄|v−t|3. Summing these fields over all small cubes gives a Riemann sum for the spatial integral, and taking the limit as Δt1, Δt2, Δt3 → 0 gives the integral itself.
Name | Differential | Integral | Description | |
(A) | Gauss Law | div E = δ | ∯S E•dn = ∫∫∫R δ dV, S=∂R | Electric flux out of closed surface equals charge enclosed |
(B) | No Magnetic Monopoles | div B = 0 | ∯S B•dn = 0 | No magnetic flux out of closed surface |
(C) | Faraday Law | curl E = −dB⁄dt | ∮C E•dc = −d⁄dt ∫∫S B•dn, C=∂S | Voltage induced around closed loop equals negative rate of change of enclosed magnetic flux |
(D) | Ampere Law | curl B = J + dE⁄dt | ∮C B•dc = ∫∫S J•dn + d⁄dt ∫∫S E•dn, C=∂S | Magnetic field around closed loop equals enclosed current plus displacement current (rate of change of enclosed electric flux) |
A = K(B) = |
|
1b. Parametrize the sphere using P(θ,φ) = Sph(ρ,θ,φ) with constant radius ρ = r, and normal vector ∂P⁄∂θ × ∂P⁄∂φ = r2 sin(φ) ̂n, where ̂n is the unit normal radial vector. The electric field is equal to ̂n⁄r2, and the integral reduces to ∫02π ∫0π sin(φ) dφ dθ = 4π.
1c. If R does not contain the origin, then the Divergence Theorem says the flux of E out of R is equal to the integral of the div E = 0 inside R. If R does contain the origin, split R into a ball of small radius at the origin, and the remaining region R' which does not contain the origin. Then the flux of E out of R is the sum of the fluxes out of the small ball and out of R', since they join along a small sphere boundary, with opposite normals. By (a) and (b), this gives 4π + 0.
1d. Gauss' Law says the flux of the electric field out of a region R is equal to the total charge inside the region. The above results mean that there is a point charge of 4π at the origin, and none elsewhere.
2a. Recall the definition of parallel and perpendicular projections from Lect 1.
2b. Apply the definition of curl B, then compute the partial derivatives using the Quotient and Chain Rules, until everything cancels.
2c. Parametrize the circle by cylindrical coordinates. The integrand becomes constant, since the rotational field is parallel to the tangent vector.
2d. If S does not meet the z-axis, then the Curl Theorem says the circulation of B around S is equal to the flux integral of curl B = 0 through S. If S does meet the z-axis, split S into a disk of small radius at the origin, and the remaining region S' which does not meet the z-axis. Then the circulation of B around S is the sum of the circulations around the small disk and around S', since they join along a small circle boundary, with opposite tangents. By (b) and (c), this gives 2π + 0.
2e. Ampere's Law for static fields says the curl of the magnetic field around a region S is equal to flux of the current through the surface. The above results mean that there is a line current of 2π along the z-axis, and none elsewhere.
3. Compute the vector integrand in coordinates, reducing to an integral of the form
− ∇x1 − |
⋮ |
− ∇xn − |
1a. Subtracting any two points on the plane P gives a direction along (parallel to) the plane, for example c− a = (2,1,1) and c− b = (1,1,2). To get to any point on the plane, move in these two directions from a base point c:
1b. A cross product u×w has direction orthogonal
to u and w, and length
|u| |w| sin θuw.
Thus, we get a normal vector, orthogonal to P,
as: n = (2,1,1) × (1,1,2) = (1,−3,1).
Now, for any point v = (x,y,z) on P, the direction
from c to v is orthogonal to n:
1c. The area of a triangle with side lengths u,w enclosing angle θ is ½uw sin θ. Our triangle has side vectors u = c−a and w = c−b, so the area is half the length of the cross product n = u×w from in part (b): area(△abc) = ½|n| = |(1,−3,1)| = ½√11.
1d. To get a vector m from the origin directly to the plane P, take any vector from the origin to P, such as c, and project it to the normal direction n orthogonal to P. The length of this projection is c dotted with the unit normal vector n⁄|n|:
1e. We can think of the tetrahedron as a cone (or pyramid) whose base is △abc and whose altitude is the vector m. The volume of any cone is ⅓ the base area times the height, which we know from parts (c) and (d), so the volume of our tetrahedron is: 1⁄3(√11⁄2)(2⁄√11) = 1⁄3 .
1f. The signed volume of the parallelpiped with edge vectors a, b, c is the determinant of the matrix of these three vectors (written as columns or rows: det(0,1,1; 1,1,0; 2,2,2) = −2, so the absolute volume is 2. The volume of a tetrahedron is 1⁄6 of this, namely 1⁄3 as before.
2a. The vector F(x,y) = (2x,1) depends only on x, and gives the same vector everywhere on a vertical line y = c: a vector pointing upward and away from the y-axis. Wolfram Alpha gives:
First step. Assume F = ∇f for some potential function f. Gradient Theorem: The line integral of the rate of increase of f along a curve is the total increase along the curve: ∮ ∇f(c) • dc = f(c(1)) − f(c(0)). We can then compute f(a,b) by taking the line integral of ∇f(x,y) from a base point (0,0) to (a,b). This line integral depends only on the endpoints (0,0) and (a,b), and is independent of how c(t) travels between them.
Second step. Suppose F is path indepenent. Given two paths c1, c2 between two points, we can follow the first path out and the second one back to get a closed curve c. Since the line integrals along c1 and c2 are equal, their difference, the line integral around c, is zero. That is, the vector field is irrotational, having zero line integral around any closed curve.
Third step. Curl Theorem: The double integral of the rate of rotation of F over a region R is equal to the total rotation of F around the boundary of R. If F is irrotational, having zero total rotation around any closed curve, this means the rate of rotation at every point must be zero: curl F(x,y) = 0 everywhere.
2d. For F(x,y) = (p(x,y), q(x,y)), the curl F(x,y) = ∂q⁄∂x − ∂p⁄∂y measures how strongly a small paddlewheel at (x,y) would be turned by a fluid flowing with velocity F. A left-to-right increase in the vertical component of F leads to a positive (couterclockwise) curl, hence the term ∂q⁄∂x; a bottom-to-top increase in the horizontal component of F leads to a negative (clockwise) curl, hence the term −∂p⁄∂y.
2e. curl F = ∂⁄∂x(1) − ∂⁄∂y(2x) = 0. Thus F is irrotational, and must have a potential function f.
2f. We compute the potential function f(x,y) at (x,y) = (a,b) as the line integral of F(x,y) = (2x, 1) along the straight-line path c(t) = (at, bt) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1:
= ∮01 F(at, bt) • (at, bt)' dt = ∫01 (2at,1) • (a,b) dt = ∫01 2a2t + b dt = a2 + b.
3a. The quarter-turn ℓ0 takes i to j = (0,1), and j to −i = (−1,0). The corresponding matrix of column-vectors is:
[ ℓ0 ] | = |
|
3b. The z-axis quarter-rotation takes i to j, j to −i, and k to itself. These output vectors are the column vectors of the matrix; and similarly for the x-axis quarter-rotation. (Note: we are using the right-handed rotation, in which the thumb points along the positive axis of rotation, and the fingers curl in the rotation direction.)
[ ℓz ] | = |
| [ ℓx ] | = |
|
3c. Multiplying the above gives the matrix of composite linear mapping ℓz(ℓx(v)):
[ ℓz ∘ ℓx ] | = |
|
3d. The columns of the above matrix are the outputs of the coordinate vectors: the mapping takes i → j → k → i. That is, the equilateral triangle with corners at i,j,k is rotated around its center ⅓(i+j+k) = (⅓,⅓,⅓). This means the linear mapping is a 120° rotation around the axis (⅓,⅓,⅓), or equivalently the axis (1,1,1). Note that composing in the other order, ℓx ∘ ℓz, gives a 120° rotation around a different axis.
4a. The Jacobian at (x,y) = (½, 0) of:
[ Df(½, 0) ] | = |
| = |
|
4b. The point (x,y) = (½, 0) is on the line between 0 and i. We can predict the first column of the Jacobian by seeing that moving along the x-axis will have exactly opposite effects on the distances to 0 and i, which accounts for the +1 and −1; while it increases the distance to j at a positive rate, accounting for the bottom entry. As for the second column, moving vertically will affect the distances to 0 and i only tangentially (quadratically), so the first two rows are zero; while the last row is negative, since the vertical motion decreases the distance to j.
4c. The derivative of g(x,y,z) = x+y+z is the row-vector gradient: ∇g(x,y,z) = [1 1 1]. Multiplying a 1×3 matrix by a 3×2 matrix gives a 1×2 matrix, whch is the gradient of g(f(x,y)).
5. See the identities on [MT] p. 255.
5a. curl grad f = (0,0,0) for any function, which you can check from the definitions, coordinate-by-coordinate.
5b. div curl F = 0.
5c. div grad f = ∂2f⁄∂x2 + ∂2f⁄∂y2 + ∂2f⁄∂z2 .
1a. See picture on p. 270 #7. The wedge is defined by x2 + y2 ≤ r and 0 ≤ z ≤ mx, where m = tan θ. Writing the xy-shadow in y-simple form: -r ≤ x ≤ r, √−(r2−x2) ≤ y ≤ (r2−x2); and also 0 ≤ z ≤ mx. The volume integral becomes:
The inner integral is the area of the rectangular vertical cross-section of the solid in the plane y = c, where c is a fixed value of x.
2 & 3a. See class notes.
16-9 #12(a). The equation x2 + y2 = 2ax is equivalent to (x−a)2 + y2 = a2, a circle centered at (a,0) with radius a, so that the circle contains the origin. The first two circles have centers (1,0) and (3,0), and similarly the second two have centers (0,1) and (0,4).
12(b). The line u = c is parametrized by (c,t) for t ∈ R, which corresponds to (x,y) = T(c,t). It is easy to verify that x = 2c⁄(c2+t2) and y = 2t⁄(c2+t2) satisfy x2 + y2 = 2⁄c x, which is equivalent to the circle equation. Similarly for v = c.
12(c). From the picture, we see R = { (x,y) = T(u,v) for 1⁄3 ≤ u ≤ 1 , 1⁄4 ≤ v ≤ 1 }
12(d). You can do this with Wolfram Alpha by pasting partial results into a scratch file, then pasting back into W|A. Result: the Jacobian determinant (streching factor) is |−4⁄(u2+v2)2| = 4⁄(u2+v2)2 .
12(e). The integral reduces to ∫1⅓ ∫1¼ (u2+v2)2 1⁄4(u2+v2)2 dv du = 1⁄8.
12(f). Use W|A to solve the system of equations
x = 2u⁄(u2+v2)
and y = 2v⁄(u2+v2)
for the variables u,v. Keep in mind that the equations
are symmetric upon switching u,v and simultaneously switching x,y,
so a solution for u can be switched into a solution for v.
Note: This is also evident from the polar description
of T as an inversion across a circle of radius √2.
Furthermore, we can write T as a conjugate inversion
in the plane of complex numbers.
That is, we let (x,y) correspond to
the complex variable z = x + iy
with conjugate
z = x − iy;
then T(x,y) corresponds to the mapping
z ↦ 2⁄z
=
2z⁄zz.
16-6 #13. The solid bounded by planes y + z = 4, y = 0, z = 0,
and the parabolic cylinder y = 4−x2.
First examine the boundary surfaces involving only x,y: the
back wall y = 0, and the curving front wall y = 4−x2.
Next consider the roughly horizontal surfaces involving z:
the floor z = 0 and the slanted ceiling z = 4−x.
16-6 #19. The solid bounded by planes x + y + z = 2 and x = 0,
and the parabolic cylinders y = z2 and z = y2.
First examine the boundary surfaces involving only y,z: the
parabolic cylinders cutting each other in a squashed cylinder.
Next consider the surfaces involving x:
x = 0 and x = 2 − y − z, which cut off the ends of
the squashed cylinder.
2a. We have ∇f(x,y,z) = (2x, −z, y) and its dual φ = df = 2x dx − z dy + y dz.
2b. The line integral of φ = df is another notation for that of ∇f:
1b. By definition, for a parametrization P : S* → S, P(u,v) = (x(u,v), y(u,v)):
= ∬S* f(P(u,v)) det(∂P⁄∂u , ∂P⁄∂u) du dv = ∬S* f(x,y) dx dy.
1c. Expand d(p dx + q dy) = dp ∧ dx + dq ∧ dy = (∂p⁄∂x dx + ∂p⁄∂y dy) ∧ dx + · · ·
2. The formulas are all analogs of the 2-dimensional computations in #1, using the definition of the derivative dφ, the line integral ∫c φ from the previous lecture, the Hodge star G☆, and the integral of a 2-form ∬S η.
In (c), the computation of η(∂P⁄∂u , ∂P⁄∂v)
ends up equal to
the triple product
G • (∂P⁄∂u
× ∂P⁄∂v),
because cross product is also alternating and bilinear,
like η.
( |
| ) | / | ( |
| ) |
2. As for the R2 case, this reduces to the Substitution Formula.
3. This follows from d(d(F*)) = 0.
4. For φ = F* = p dx + q dy + r dz + s dw, a 1-form on R4, expand out the exteior deriative
Turn in:
∫ab f(g(t)) g'(t) dt | = |
|
Solution
16-9 #12(a). The equation x2 + y2 = 2ax
is equivalent to (x−a)2 + y2 = a2, a circle centered at (a,0) with radius a,
so that the circle contains the origin.
The first two circles have centers (1,0) and (3,0),
and similarly the second two have centers (0,1) and (0,4).
12(b). The line u = c is parametrized by (c,t) for t ∈ R, which corresponds to (x,y) = T(c,t). It is easy to verify that x = 2c⁄(c2+t2) and y = 2t⁄(c2+t2) satisfy x2 + y2 = 2⁄c x, which is equivalent to the circle equation. Similarly for v = c.
12(c). From the picture, we see R = { (x,y) = T(u,v) for 1⁄3 ≤ u ≤ 1 , 1⁄4 ≤ v ≤ 1 }
12(d). You can do this with Wolfram Alpha by pasting partial results into a scratch file, then pasting back into W|A. Result: the Jacobian determinant (streching factor) is |−4⁄(u2+v2)2| = 4⁄(u2+v2)2 .
12(e). The integral reduces to ∫1⅓ ∫1¼ 1⁄16(u2+v2)2 4⁄(u2+v2)2 dv du = 1⁄8 .
12(f). Use W|A to solve the system of equations
x = 2u⁄(u2+v2)
and y = 2v⁄(u2+v2)
for the variables u,v. Keep in mind that the equations
are symmetric upon switching u,v and simultaneously switching x,y,
so a solution for u can be switched into a solution for v.
Note: This is also evident from the polar description
of T as an inversion across a circle of radius √2.
Furthermore, we can write T as a conjugate inversion
in the plane of complex numbers.
That is, we let (x,y) correspond to
the complex variable z = x + iy
with conjugate
z = x − iy;
then T(x,y) corresponds to the mapping
z ↦ 2/ z
=
2z⁄zz
=
2z⁄|z|2.